Amy Coney Barrett: Donald Trump’s Supreme Court docket nominee attacked over private views


Donald Trump’s number of Choose Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court docket seat previously held by Ruth Bader Ginsburg has prompted an explosion of anger from his political opponents in the USA.

The President announced his choice within the White Home’s Rose Backyard Saturday, praising Choose Barrett, 48, as one among America’s “most good and gifted authorized minds”.

“She is a girl of unparalleled achievement, towering mind, sterling credentials, and unyielding loyalty to the Structure,” Mr Trump mentioned.

“I urge all members of the opposite aspect of the aisle to offer Choose Barrett with the respectful and dignified listening to that she deserves and, frankly, that our nation deserves.

“I urge lawmakers and members of the media to chorus from private or partisan assaults.”

However these assaults had already began, and solely continued within the ensuing hours.

RELATED: Donald Trump announces his Supreme Court pick

RELATED: President suggests RBG’s dying wish was faked

media_cameraChoose Amy Coney Barrett yesterday. Image: Olivier Douliery/AFP


Choose Barrett graduated high of her class on the College of Notre Dame’s legislation college, and went on to clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia earlier than turning into a long-serving professor at her alma mater.

Like Justice Scalia earlier than her, she is an originalist. In different phrases, Choose Barrett believes the courts ought to interpret the US Structure because the authors supposed on the time it was written, as an alternative of treating it like a residing doc.

She turned a federal choose in 2017, when Mr Trump selected her to fill a emptiness on the Seventh Circuit Court docket of Appeals. The Senate confirmed her by a vote of 55-43, with three Democrats supporting her.

However that affirmation was not with out controversy. Throughout a listening to on Choose Barrett’s nomination, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein grilled her on her conservative non secular beliefs, implying they might have undue affect over her interpretation of the legislation.

Choose Barrett is a religious Catholic. She is firmly in opposition to abortion, and is a member of a neighborhood referred to as the Individuals of Reward, which believes – amongst different issues – that males have authority over their wives.

“If you learn your speeches, the conclusion one attracts is that the dogma lives loudly inside you. And that’s of concern once you come to massive points that giant numbers of individuals have fought for, for years on this nation,” Ms Feinstein advised her on the listening to.

Choose Barrett responded by promising to comply with “all Supreme Court docket precedent with out fail”, implying she would uphold the courtroom’s earlier selections – amongst them Roe vs Wade, which primarily legalised abortion throughout the US.

“I’d by no means impose my very own private convictions upon the legislation,” she mentioned.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett, in a photo from the University of Notre Dame, where she taught law for 15 years. Picture: Notre Dame/AFP/Julian Velasco
media_cameraChoose Amy Coney Barrett, in a photograph from the College of Notre Dame, the place she taught legislation for 15 years. Image: Notre Dame/AFP/Julian Velasco

With Choose Barrett’s return to the highlight, the assaults on her non secular beliefs from some quarters have resumed.

Comedian Bill Maher ripped into her on his TV present on Friday evening, labelling her “actually, actually Catholic”. He meant it as a pejorative.

“She’s a f***ing nut,” Maher mentioned.

“Amy Coney Barrett – Catholic. Actually Catholic. I imply actually, actually Catholic, like talking in tongues.

“Like, she doesn’t imagine in condoms, which is what she has in frequent with Trump, as a result of he doesn’t both. We discovered of that from Stormy Daniels.”

A number of US media retailers, most notably Newsweek, drew a hyperlink between the Individuals of Reward group and Margaret Atwood’s novel The Handmaid’s Story, since tailored into an award-winning TV drama.

Newsweek claimed the neighborhood had “served as an inspiration” for the book, citing its earlier follow of calling feminine non secular advisers “handmaids”.

Atwood has by no means particularly cited the Individuals of Reward as an inspiration for her dystopian society, Gilead. Chatting with ABC News in latest days, she downplayed the connection.

“I definitely didn’t confine myself to 1 sect or group,” mentioned the writer.

“So I don’t assume it is a thread that may be legitimately used on this method.”


The criticism of Choose Barrett’s religion, significantly from Maher, has been condemned throughout a lot of the political spectrum.

Authorized commentator and professor Jonathan Turley mentioned the comic’s “raving assault” showed “the triumph of rage over reason”. He additionally introduced up Ms Feinstein’s questioning from three years in the past.

“When Ginsburg, a religious Jew, was nominated, Feinstein didn’t object that, ‘The dogma lives loudly in you,’ and commentators like Maher didn’t painting her as a barking non secular fanatic or query whether or not she approves of condoms,” Prof Turley mentioned.

“Think about if a conservative commentator responded to President Obama’s nomination of (Elena) Kagan or (Sonia) Sotomayor by referring to intercourse with a stripper or referring to Kagan as ‘actually, actually Jewish’.

“To paraphrase Ms Feinstein: ‘Prejudice lives loudly in you.’”

“You’ll be able to disagree with any person based mostly on whether or not they’re pro-life or pro-choice,” former Democratic senator Joe Lieberman told Fox News.

“However once you begin to say that you simply’re in opposition to them as a result of their faith – on this case their Roman Catholicism – determines their perspective, you’re doing one thing actually abhorrent that I feel is bigoted, is un-American, and by the way, is unconstitutional.

“In America, we don’t query anyone who’s in search of an workplace of public belief based mostly on their faith. That’s what America is all about.”

And a present Democratic senator, Sheldon Whitehouse, expressed the same opinion final week.

“An individual’s non secular views or background mustn’t make any distinction, as long as it’s clear that they will depart that non-public background on the robing room door and provides neutral justice to whomever is earlier than them, no matter whether or not their private non secular views may dictate one thing completely different than the legislation,” he mentioned.


The Democratic Social gathering’s senior leaders, essentially the most vital of whom is presidential nominee Joe Biden, are vehemently against Choose Barrett’s nomination – however they’re attempting to avoid speaking about her faith.

Mr Biden argued her appointment to the Supreme Court docket may put Individuals’ healthcare underneath menace. The Trump administration is at present attempting to get Barack Obama’s signature legislation, The Reasonably priced Care Act, overturned.

“Even now, within the midst of a world well being pandemic, the Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court docket to overturn the complete legislation, together with its protections for individuals with pre-existing circumstances,” he mentioned in an announcement.

“Right this moment President Trump has nominated Choose Amy Coney Barrett because the successor to Justice Ginsburg’s seat. She has a written observe document of disagreeing with the Supreme Court docket’s determination upholding The Reasonably priced Care Act. She critiqued Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion upholding the legislation in 2012.

“The American individuals know the Supreme Court docket selections have an effect on their on a regular basis lives. The US Structure was designed to present the voters one probability to have their voice heard on who serves on the courtroom. That second is now and their voice must be heard.”

Senate Minority Chief Chuck Schumer described Mr Trump’s fast try to get Choose Barrett confirmed earlier than the election “disgraceful”, claiming he and Republican Senate Chief Mitch McConnell had “stolen two judges from the American individuals”.

Mr McConnell refused to permit a vote on Mr Obama’s Supreme Court docket nominee, Choose Merrick Garland, earlier than the 2016 election. Mr Trump went on to fill that seat with Justice Neil Gorsuch, a conservative.

“Choose Ginsburg had a dying want that the following president select. Justice Ginsburg have to be turning over in her grave in heaven to see that the individual they selected appears to be intent on undoing all of the issues that Ginsburg did,” mentioned Mr Schumer.

“I’ll strongly, strongly, strongly oppose this nomination.”

Mr Trump, Judge Barrett, and her family. Picture: Olivier Douliery/AFP
media_cameraMr Trump, Choose Barrett, and her household. Image: Olivier Douliery/AFP


Choose Barrett herself appeared alongside Mr Trump as he introduced her nomination yesterday. When he was completed, she received an opportunity to talk.

“I totally perceive that it is a momentous determination for a President. And if the Senate does me the honour of confirming me, I pledge to discharge the duties of this job to the perfect of my capability,” Choose Barrett mentioned.

She went on to pay tribute to the lady she may exchange, Justice Ginsburg, who was an icon of progressive legislation.

“Ought to I be confirmed, I shall be aware of who got here earlier than me,” she promised.

“The flag of the USA continues to be flying at half workers in reminiscence of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, to mark the tip of an amazing American life.

“Justice Ginsburg started her profession at a time when girls weren’t welcome within the authorized career. However she not solely broke glass ceilings, she smashed them. For that, she has gained the admiration of girls throughout the nation and, certainly, all around the world.

“She was a girl of huge expertise and consequence, and her lifetime of public service serves for instance to us all. Significantly poignant to me was her lengthy and deep friendship with Justice Antonin Scalia, my very own mentor.

“Justices Scalia and Ginsburg disagreed fiercely in print with out rancour in individual. Their capability to take care of a heat and wealthy friendship, regardless of their variations, even impressed an opera.

“These two nice Individuals demonstrated that arguments, even about issues of nice consequence, needn’t destroy affection. In each my private {and professional} relationships, I attempt to satisfy that commonplace.

“I clerked for Justice Scalia greater than 20 years in the past, however the classes I discovered nonetheless resonate. His judicial philosophy is mine too. A choose should apply the legislation as written.

“Judges aren’t policymakers, and so they have to be resolute in setting apart any coverage views they could maintain.”

Initially revealed as ‘She’s a nut’: ‘Raving’ attack on judge


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here